The comments here track what I've seen elsewhere on the blogosphere:
1) Far-right social-conservative tells reasonable conservative they're making a mountain out of a molehill; that the JBS is really not that big a deal (in which case, I don't understand why they would be invited?)
2) Refer to reasonable conservative asking these questions as a screaming, foaming at the mouth liberal.
I'm heartbroken that conservatism, or the hysteria that's masquerading in its name, continues to careen off the rails.
The question is who's more reasonable and less emotional in these debates - is it the people comfortable with the JBS, or the people who aren't? If your measure of a conservative is that they're not hysterical enough, maybe it's time for a new metric.
Comment Posted By Tom Paine On 23.12.2009 @ 21:27